3 Reasons Why The Raw Card Review MBA Service Is Problematic
As the collectible card industry has flourished, so has the demand for card filing services. Previously, owners had to send their cards to reviewers who would give a score based on the condition of the item for a fee. The score of the card is directly proportional to the wear. Keep it as perfect as possible and a card can even get a perfect score of 10.
However, filing takes time, not to mention the time it takes to get the card back to the owner. Beckett tried to solve this problem by offering a raw card verification service. Cardporn said collectors can get quick notes on their cards at events and trade shows. After which, the owner can send the card to Beckett for the slab at $ 10 per piece.
The service collapsed as the market also slowed. But now that the sports trading card market is growing and evolving, Mike Baker Authenticated is bringing back Raw Card Review.
The fine print on the raw MBA card exam
On their Instagram account, MBA said that increased activity in the hobby creates a void for people who aspire to an accurate and expert card certification process. Add to this the lack of scoring facilities for low value cards (between $ 10 and $ 500), and MBA felt the need to offer the RCR.
They will accept raw trading card submissions at industry events. But there’s a catch: they’ll only note maps released from 2000 or later. Cards must measure 3.5 inches by 2.5 inches and will go through a 10-step inspection. After the assessment, the MBA can give a grade of 10 (Gem Mint) or 9 (Mint). MBA will publish the newsletter for any rate lower than these, but will not award a specific rating.
Interested parties have to shell out $ 20 for a single card, $ 100 for an eight-card pack, and $ 500 for 50 raw card reviews. Collectors get better value for submitting more cards. But is Raw Card Review worth the price?
Problems with the Raw MBA Map Service
First, ranking accuracy will be the primary concern of raw card ranking. Will Mike Baker Authenticated (MBA) offer the same internal device they use in scorecards at industry events? Otherwise, there may be a discrepancy between the rating during the event and the actual rating. This problem persisted during Beckett’s service, and it is unlikely to change anytime soon.
Some members of the Freedom Card Board Forums pointed out the deviations that occur. One commented that his card with a 9.5 rating came back in a slab with only an 8.5 rating, drastically reducing the value of the card by hundreds or even thousands of dollars.
Secondly, time is also an important factor when revising raw maps. As in the example above, there was no time pressure to inspect the card and ultimately give it an 8.5. This is not the case during card exhibitions.
Hundreds of collectors will want their cards evaluated, and reviewers must complete it within the hours of the event, as they will be in another location in a few days. They don’t have much time to take a close look at every detail which leads to hastily given ratings, not to mention the distractions of the crowd and just the noise that echoes throughout the event.
Of course, evaluators check hundreds of cards daily. But they can do their jobs best in a controlled setting in the quiet nature of their office. While there is still a period of time to complete the grading, there is less pressure, unlike getting a grade in minutes.
Finally, not giving precise ratings below nine or mint is a concern for collectors who have traveled from afar. Imagine getting a ballot for their cards, but not an exact rating. They have to find another authenticator, which translates into additional expense.
Instead of getting a fair grade for the card, they should send it in for better appraisal and better appraisal, which adds days or weeks before it can have its proper value.
Indeed, Mike Baker Authenticated has good intentions to relaunch Raw Card Review. But the process still shows several glaring flaws that need to be addressed. Therefore, it is always best to send collectible cards to CSG, Beckett, or PSA for fair and honest scoring, even if it will take some time.